Your
one stop guide to the great conspiracies of our time
Please
see this page as a work in progress. If you have any comments please
contact us at editor@theVoiceofReason.com.
The
main conspiracy points put forward are outlined below. (This
list is not comprehensive, we have chosen what we believe to be
the most believable. It will be updated.)
One
of the most popular conspiracy arguments on the internet today is
made by the impressive documentary Loose Change. We have a complete
copy of the second edition of this movie on the site, indexed. To
see the index go here.
Conspiracy
1) The
smoking gun: The George W Bush administration conspired to either
organize the attacks or, at the very least, allowed them to take
place. The evidence for this, conspiracy supporters argue, comes
in the form of a policy document - Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century
(pdf,
size: 852KB) (external link
to newamericancentury.org)
- which was written a year before 9/11. The report was authored
by leading members of the Bush administration under the name of
The Project for the New American Century (Dick Cheney,
Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush were contributors to
this report, according to UK Channel 4 documentary 'The 9/11 Conspiracies',
broadcast 9/9/2004). The report says that it would only be possible
to fully secure America's defenses in the world if there was a
'catastrophic' or 'catalyzing event', 'such as a Pearl Harbor'.
Michael
Moore's movie Fahrenheit 911 argues that the Bush presidency
used 911 to radically increase powers at home and to increase
a climate of fear, so that it could wage wars which will increase
America's influence in other areas - American business has much
to gain from the reconstruction and oil in Iraq. In a meeting
after 11th September, Bush was keen to find a connection with
Iraq so that it could be attacked. [Loose
Change - Chapter 1]
Possible
Counter:
There is a report, and it does say these things (page 63), but
does it mean that these people therefore engineered 9/11? This
is seen as a smoking gun by many conspiracy supporters, and, even
for skeptics, this is quite a strange report. The counter must
be that the George W Bush administration would be absolute monsters
to do it (which is what the conspiracy supporters
are, indeed, saying). After 9/11 the Bush administration pretty
much did react in the way set out in the report.
Iraq never had anything to do with 9/11. Would the Bush administration
have been empowered to embark on this foreign policy they did
do after 911 had 911 not happened? It seems unlikely to us.
Conspiracy
2) The collapse of the World Trade Center building 7, which
was not hit by a plane at all. Conspiracy experts say that it
had to be destroyed because it housed a secret government bunker
used to coordinate the attacks. The NY emergency
unit is in this building.
WTC7
was not hit by a plane, it stood 300 yards away from the WTC 1
and 2. But it fell neatly as if under controlled demolition on
the evening of the attacks.
Official
explanation: The initial report into this says that
the WTC7 building collapsed because of fire, but admitted that
this explanation was not likely. A second report is still not
finished (as at 9th March 2007), but it is expected to confirm
the initial findings. [Loose
Change - Chapter 6].
Conspiracy
3) The World Trade Center buildings were supposedly brought
down by intense heat of the engine fuel burning. However if that
is true, then how come this woman is standing by the impact hole
in the World Trade Center?
Conspiracy
4) The World Trade Center buildings were brought down by a
controlled demolition, they fell at free fall speeds which is simply
impossible (conspiracy experts say) without other explosives pulling
the building down. Even
if this was possible only parts of the building would have fallen,
not the whole building.
Conspiracy supporters say that a steel framed high rise building
has never collapsed before just because of fire. The collapse
is consistent with a controlled demolition.
Did US agents plant explosive charges to maximize the death toll?
An
interesting conspiracy point from Loose Change 2nd Edition is
the observance of plumes of smoke coming from underneath the fall
of the building [Chapter
9]. There are also claims of secondary and other explosions,
and an intriguing conversation between NYPD men suggesting that
the floors had been blown out 'one by one'. [Loose
Change - Chapters 7,
8
and 9.]
Counter:
The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were designed
in the 1960's to withstand either a hit from an airplane or fire,
but this attack was both together. Leslie Robertson, Structural
Engineer of the World Trade Center: "There is no evidence
there was a bomb inside." The planes were filled with fuel
and this set off a chain reaction in the buildings which caused
the damage.
Conspiracy
5) The Pentagon attack. Conspiracy experts say that there
is some confusion what actually hit the Pentagon. Could the hole
in the side of the building have been made by a Boeing 757 which
has a soft, crushable, nose, and in any case where are the engines?
Conspiracy experts say that the engines could not possibly have
vaporized as the temperatures required were much higher than those
possible... or could they?
The
conspiracy line is that the damage was done by a cruise missile.
[Loose
Change - Chapters 3,
4
and 5].
Counter:
This is an interesting point because what actually hit the Pentagon
can be answered simply by the release of a number of other security
camera footage which was apparently collected up by FBI agents
soon after the attack. Until that time the conspiracy arguments
can go on. Loose Change argues that this is evidence of a cover
up. Until
that time all we have are these intriguing pictures that don't
show what hit the building.
Conspiracy
6) Fox TV shows The Lone Gunman 6 months before 9-11. In this
fictional show a government conspiracy leads to a hijack of a
passenger airline in order to crash it into the Twin Towers as
a pretext for war against a dictator. The final crash is averted
in the show.
On
Conspiracy Files 911, BBC TV, the creator of the series denied
any conspiracy, it was a simple creative venture he said. The
official version of 911 says that the terrorists planned the attacks
2 years before 9/11.
Conspiracy 7) Osama bin Laden didn't organize 911, he was just a convenient patsy. The conspiracy argument claims that Osama bin Laden is now dead and that the CIA are continuing to bring out new videos and audio because Osama acts as a focus of hate justifying, in part, the continuance of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Digitally altering video and audio is very possible, as the spoof video at the bottom of this section shows.
Remember the Osama Bin Laden video released just before the 2004 US presidential elections? This undeniably gave Bush a boost in the polls.
But senior government experts all claim that the videos are genuine. This is what we have found:
This is a confirmed picture of Osama Bin Laden:
And so is this:
Much is made of the confession tape found in 2001 in which Osama bin Laden seemingly admits to organizing the Twin Towers attacks in New York. Loose Change, amongst others, say this tape is a fake and that this is the only link between Osama bin Laden and the 911 attacks. They argue the images of bin Laden don't even look like him...
This is a picture from the confession tape used by Loose Change as evidence that the man in the confession video doesn't look like Osama Bin Laden:
Here is another picture from the same tape that we took from the confession video on YouTube, below (we think this looks like him):
Youtube - Clip from 'Confession Video' in which OBL seems to admit being behind the Twin Tower attacks
Below is a brilliant spoof of a recent (2007) Osama Bin Laden video in which he has a black beard which, if nothing else, proves how good a faked OBL video can be...
Youtube Argument: Interesting arguments from Noam Chomsky, who essentially says that the Bush administration would have been insane to organize 911, that too many things could have gone wrong and had it gone wrong or there was a leak they would have faced the firing squad, that there are always convergent arguments in any experiment, and takes note that there is a large industry surrounding the conspiracy arguments:
Sources:
'9/11 Conspiracies'. UK Channel 4. Broadcast 9/9/2004 (mentorn oxford,
a television corporation company). Loose Change, a Louder Than Words
Production.
The
Voice of Reason is, firstly, a comedy/satire site. This Conspiracy
Clinic strand is our first attempt at serious reporting.